Practical RDF by Shelley Powers

Practical RDF



Download eBook




Practical RDF Shelley Powers ebook
Publisher: O'Reilly Media
Format: chm
Page: 331
ISBN: 0596002637, 9780596002633


I am not in favour of RDF or JSON in this case, but I think that in order to have an accepted Practical JSON Format Standard you need more, in fact, I don't understand why this is more “Practical” than anything in JSON. I've been mulling over this alternate way of thinking about RDF, one that is resource-oriented rather than triple-oriented. Also, many people may be disappointed to learn that their college courses in philosophy might turn out to be of practical use. SemTech 2010 – Practical RDF · Uncategorized Add comments. The Resource Description Framework (RDF) is a framework for representing information in the Web. For special (throwaway) cases with deterministic serialization though, it may be practical. What this means is that one can refer to an RDF/XML, Excel, or a BibTex file instead of the JSON code, and Exhibit will convert it to RDF on the fly. I helped TimBL refine Delta: an ontology for the distribution of differences between RDF graphs a bit, and there's working code in cwm. RDF is based on “URI references” which have a different syntax, but all practical RDF data should follow the generic URI syntax. Literals are usually abstract values and describing them in most cases is not necessary nor practical. A couple of years ago, I started reading Shelley Powers' book, “Practical RDF” [1]. To better understand literals, one can make an analogy between the RDF model and the object-oriented (OO) model. The problem of how to gain the benefits of RDF without paying the full costs of dealing with low-level data was addressed in this presentation at semtech. RDF has a simple data model that is easy Yeah, I agree that the resource-centric (or node-centric) view is more practical, and that's the direction we took in Needle, too. This is what I came up with: ~~~~. In the context of RDF's semantic model, the TRUTH of a triple has a very limited, formal meaning. So, to try it out, I put together a small example: the list of the W3C related talks of my buddies, ie, people whose Twitter feed. But I haven't really managed to use it in practical settings. This is also implied by the Linked Data Principles which encourage you to use HTTP URIs. I see RDF/XML as an "end format", it makes little sense to transform that (same goes for stuff like SVG I guess).